From the author: I do not support or encourage you to hate anyone for anything. Although I myself am a completely intolerant person, this does not in any way encourage me to hate anyone. In view of the many factors that shape and influence Society, the topic of hatred arises every now and then, raising sharp and very uncomfortable questions. Today I also want to talk about hatred, or rather, I want to ask questions about it. The questions are simple, but deliberately convex and rhetorical. I don’t need to answer them, but I highly recommend thinking about it for yourself... Straight away, dotting the i’s, I’ll explain my position: I do not support and do not call for hating anyone for anything. Although I myself am a completely intolerant person, this does not in any way encourage me to hate anyone, probably the reason for this is concentration on my own life and creativity + a good dose of natural “not giving a damn.” However, I reserve the right to hate if it appears. Perhaps the closest feeling I have to hatred is for philosophical, religious and political ideologies, which all distort people’s perceptions and thinking. I’ll start my discussion with the fact that hatred is often equated with intolerance or... how fashionable it is to talk about lack of tolerance, while forgetting simple fact: hatred is an emotion, the appearance of which is not a product of the will and arbitrary control of a person, while tolerance is an ideological construct, according to which hatred is something clearly bad that needs to be prohibited to others, suppressed, and something that needs to be gotten rid of , as soon as it appears. This immediately clearly shows the artificiality of the rules of the social environment, which deny the connection between man and Nature, because... emotions, as we know, are a natural phenomenon, not a social one. Emotions are simply given to us as a species by default; they cannot be prohibited or selectively isolated, divided into “good” and “not good.” Many people say that hatred is a destructive emotion. Okay, maybe so, but... what's next? Is it really possible that there will never be hatred from such an assessment? Are there biological tools and mechanisms that allow you to “turn off” hatred? After all, isn’t hatred, like any other human emotion, a personal right? In the sense that if hatred suddenly arose, then why should a person give it up and do something about it, just to get rid of it? Well, it is there... let’s say, (almost) no one calls to get rid of joy or love, but these are also emotions. However, according to the ideology of tolerance, which prescribes hatred to be condemned and expelled from others, just like the Christian Church cast out demons in the Middle Ages, it turns out that in a Society that supposedly lives under the slogan of “human-centrism,” that is, when essentially everything is possible, in fact, some emotions are still objectionable and subject to condemnation. Somehow, this approach to the ideology of tolerance is not particularly tolerant. Based on the ideological background of the view on hatred, which in itself looks like a desire to hammer a nail with a raw egg, reasonable questions arise: is all hatred really prohibited? Who can you really hate? Let's start with the obvious... is it possible to hate pedophiles? Rapists? And the murderers? What about terrorists...can you hate them? What about the doctor who operated on a child while drunk and killed him? And the competitor who set bandits against you in order to squeeze you out of the market? Can a woman hate her ex-husband who ran away and does not pay child support for three children? And the man whose wife cheated on him recklessly? And if the answers to such questions are “yes, you can hate these categories of comrades...”, then it turns out that ideology somehow finds a way to divide hatred into “bad” and “good.” But how is it proposed to do this instrumentally? Let me remind you that emotions, in principle, are not arbitrary elements, so how then can a person take one specific emotion in isolation and... make an additional division within it? On my.